Brag document template for solutions architects
Solutions architects are measured on customer implementations that succeeded and on deals technically unblocked. Both are attributable, and both need naming.
What this role is judged on
- Customer implementations delivered and adopted
- Deals unblocked by technical validation or proof of concept
- Reference architectures reused beyond their original customer
- Escalations resolved and their root causes fed back to product
- Product feedback that changed the roadmap
What this role is measured on
This role sits between the product and the customer, and its value is that it makes a general product work for a specific situation. That gives it an unusual advantage at review time compared to purely internal engineering roles: the outcomes have customer names attached, and named outcomes are the most persuasive evidence there is.
Implementation success is the primary axis, and success means adopted rather than delivered. A deployment that went live and is genuinely used is a different result from one that went live and sat there, and the distinction is worth drawing yourself before someone else draws it.
Technical unblocking of deals is the commercially legible half of the job. A proof of concept that satisfied an evaluation, an integration question answered convincingly, an architecture review that removed a customer's objection: each of those has a deal attached and a value attached.
Reuse is the leverage axis. A reference architecture written once for one customer and then used by ten others, or by partners you never met, multiplies a week of work into a permanent asset.
Feedback to product is the fourth axis and the one architects most often perform without recording. You see the same customer objection repeatedly, and you are the only person positioned to notice the pattern.
Wins that read well for this role
- "Led the implementation at
, live in , now running ." - "Unblocked
by proving in a proof of concept over ." - "Wrote
, since reused by without my involvement." - "Resolved
at and traced it to , which product then fixed for everyone." - "Surfaced the pattern behind
, which changed ."
Common undersell
Architects undersell the reuse. The reference architecture that ten other people used is filed as a document written, when it is in fact ten implementations you contributed to without being in the room. Report it as reach.
The second undersell is the product feedback loop. You hold information nobody else has, because you are the one hearing the same objection at customer after customer. Passing that on well is a genuine contribution to the roadmap, and it disappears into ordinary conversation unless you claim it.
The third is the deal you correctly walked away from. Telling a sales team the product genuinely will not do what a prospect needs protects the company from a bad implementation and a bad reference, and it costs you a win in the short-term ledger.